October 18, 2005

Welcome

Welcome to the English Club Chatter Weblog. We will be posting threads fairly often, and we hope that you will join in. If you have any questions about how this works, feel free to email me at, laughbaum.12@osu.edu
We look forward to hearing your comments. Thanks and happy blogging!

Posted by tlaughbaum at October 18, 2005 11:53 AM
Comments

Hello, testing weblog 1

Posted by: Corwin Thompson at October 18, 2005 02:02 PM

hey, this is great trisha way to set up a great weblog.

Hey corwin, how you doin?Read any good books lately? :)

Posted by: Jesi at October 18, 2005 06:45 PM

Thanks for the compliment Jesi!

Posted by: Trish at October 18, 2005 08:46 PM

Definitely a great job, Trish! Jesi, have you read any good books lately? I think this should be our recommendations page, too. Where we can start a thread about books, and if a bunch of us like it/read it we can move onto another thread and start a discussion about it. :-)

Posted by: Erin Bistline at October 19, 2005 04:00 PM

All thanks goes to Susan Delagrange. She's the one who set up the whole blog; she just showed me how to use it.

Posted by: Trish at October 19, 2005 07:46 PM

Good books? Try Servant of the Bones, by Ann Rice. And, no, it's not a vampire book.

Posted by: J. Gordon Bennett at October 19, 2005 08:07 PM

I want to start a thread about "The Da Vinci Code." It's my secret shame.

Posted by: Trish at October 19, 2005 08:21 PM

I’ll admit the book was well written, but I hope you haven’t fallen for the assertion that it is even remotely accurate. It would take to much space to debunk it here, and I don’t really care what anyone believes (as long as they don’t want to behead me or anything) I just object to author’s using discredited sources and depending on the general laziness of the American public knowing that we (myself included) will usually not bother to check the source of a claim.

Just one small fact before I quit, brown has a website where he “shows his sources” here is an example of how he is getting rich by intentionally fooling people: Brown’s site states that this cryptic message “hints at a shocking historical secret which allegedly has been guarded since 1099 by a European secret society known as the Priory of Sion.” Nevermind that the Priory of Sion was founded in the 1950s in France by a political radical, that its mysterious history is an admitted fabrication, and that it has been proven more than once to be a complete hoax. And yet the Priory of Sion is a central element in the plot and logic (so to speak) of The Da Vinci Code (excerpt from the Da Vinchi Fraud) It is a shame he couldn’t use his talent without feeling the need to hype his work.

Posted by: J. Gordon Bennett at October 20, 2005 07:02 PM

I am well aware of the discrepancies of Brown's work (hence my shame). It has been discussed before about making a thread about the responsibility of fiction authors of being historically correct; after all, it is fiction (and did he explicitly present it otherwise?) I was going to save it for later, but we can start one now if you would like...

Posted by: Trish at October 20, 2005 08:04 PM

Is it hot in here? or is it just the blog?

Posted by: GOODNESS at October 20, 2005 08:23 PM

It's all you, Jesi (ask me how I knew)
That's what I don't like about blogs. I wrote that last bit with a smile on my face, but you can't tell, it kind of sounds terse. I will use emoticons form now on to express my tone of voice. (Happy! Joy!) ;)

Posted by: Trish at October 20, 2005 08:35 PM

Trish and I have briefly spoken offline about the ethical responsibility (or lack thereof) of fiction writers who rely on (pseudo-)history in creating their texts. Either way, it might be an interesting thread to pursue, though perhaps it should wait until the figurative language thread more fully plays out. Brown's use of allegory, symbolism, and the like will surely benefit from whatever we uncover in the other thread.

Posted by: Dion C. Cautrell at October 20, 2005 09:40 PM

gee trish why do you think thats JeSi?

Posted by: Wondering at October 23, 2005 10:56 PM

Because I am the all knowing, all powerful, Queen of the Blog!! (cue maniacal laughing) But... I think you figured out my trick, didn't you?

Posted by: Trish at October 24, 2005 11:09 AM

Ok, what's an emoticon? Is it those strange little symbols that you see in chatrooms? I guess I need to pay more attention to this eletronic thing-a-ma-jig.

Posted by: J. Gordon Bennett at October 24, 2005 09:29 PM

HAh...you'll never find my true identity....

oh and yes j that that is an emoticon...

:) = smile

;) = smile wink...

anonomyous.

Posted by: noisuredidnt at October 24, 2005 11:21 PM

Oh yeah??!!? I have eyes all over this campus, missy... Don't think you're so clever ;)

Posted by: 2canplaythisgame at October 25, 2005 01:04 PM

Good books lately? Try Freakonomics (excellent, if a little extreme), or Moneyball (brought to my attention by Dr. Shaffer, and I liked it, even though I hate baseball (is that grounds for political imprisonment?), and I give high praise to Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs.
How's that Jesi?

Posted by: Corwin Thompson at October 25, 2005 02:17 PM

If anyone is an Anne Rice fan, please let us know how her new Jesus book fits into this conversation.

Posted by: Jim Snyder at October 27, 2005 07:34 AM

Also, I enjoyed the book Grendel, but haven't been keen on reading other books that conjur up alternative points of view and back stories from classic tales. I wonder why that is, particularly when I have considered writing a couple of them myself. Can someone recommend one from this genre that is genuinely worth perusing?

Posted by: Jim Snyder at October 27, 2005 07:44 AM

If you're looking for spins on old tales, Jim, I would suggest 'Wicked.' I haven't read it as yet, but some people around the writing center absolutely love it, and it seems interesting. It's the story of the Wicked Witch of the West, before Oz.

Posted by: Trish at October 27, 2005 05:59 PM